serve as relevant legal sources

20:07 Jun 5, 2023 

"Republic of Belarus, for which the Republic of Belarus of 18 May 2006 and Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 regarding restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus serve as relevant legal sources,"

ON ITS OWN is pure nonsense. Is that by any change a "segment" cut arbitrarily from the full sentence by some software that is supposed to help?

Could you quote the full sentence or a meaningful fragment? Then it might start making sense for those who don't follow EU politics, instead of only to those who can guess the missing parts.

In fact, if you limite the quote to

... for which the Republic of Belarus of 18 May 2006 and Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 regarding restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus serve as relevant legal sources, ...

it starts making sense, whatever "which" refers to - and it's certainly NOT "Republic of Belarus" but some other text before that part, about some kind of decision or action based on Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 as legal source.

21:01 Jun 4, 2023 

Would it be possible to have the first part of the sentence?

20:54 Jun 2, 2023 

Je pense à une traduction comme ci: 'La république biélorussie du 18 mai de 2006 et le règlement du Conseil numéro 765/2006 quant au renforcement des mesures restricitives en contre un président et de certains fonctionnaires de Bélarus font le fondement des preuves juridiques qui s'appartiennent.'