GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
08:35 Sep 18, 2007 |
French to English translations [PRO] Government / Politics / Defense industry | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Martin Cassell United Kingdom Local time: 16:05 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +2 | Meccano |
| ||
3 +1 | Meccano |
| ||
3 | nesting industrial structure |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
nesting industrial structure Explanation: just a proposal |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Meccano Explanation: In this respect, the Airbus aircraft we know and enjoy are pieces of gigantic Meccano. The wings are (or were) made in Wales, landing gear in ... Spain(?), engines somewhere else, fuselage sections all over France, something in Germany. All the bits are transported by air, road, barge, and sea to Toulouse and bolted together, hopefully with something more substantial than the little bolts and square nuts of my Meccano childhood. Large, oversize boxes marked "Airbus" - containing fuselage sections, I think - are a regular sight on the roads near here, heading up to Les Mureaux Since everything is a "kitset" to some extent, I fail to see the problem. Whether made in different corners of a single company or in different corners of Europe or beyond, the result is the same. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2007-09-18 09:57:36 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- "of a single COUNTRY" is what I meant to say. |
| |